When looking at ways to reduce our carbon footprint, people say taking public transportation or walking to work would be a great way to start. As of 2025, there are 1.644 billion cars in the world and 17% of those are in the United States. Because of this, cars and transportation are a huge contributor to climate change and global warming.
Gasoline isn’t our only option
Cars do not have to run on gasoline only! There are plenty of alternatives that are more environmentally friendly and will still get us to where we need to be.
CNG - Compressed Natural Gas
CNG is basically methane stored at an extremely high pressure. This, while it’s not perfect, could be a step in the right direction. It is known for being a cleaner burning and it’s safer to handle and transport.
Pros:
Improves life of lubricating oils within engine
Easier to mix with air
Produces less CO2, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and sulfur oxides.
Cons:
Storing takes more space than typical gas tank
Needs to be stored under pressure which means car could explode (chance is minimal)
Biomass-derived Methane
Methane doesn’t have to be extracted from natural reserves, it can be obtained by fermenting biomass making this a renewable resource.
Pros:
Can be used in Otto cycle combustion engines
Reduces harmful oxides into the atmosphere
Cons:
The process cannot produce nearly as much as it could from natural reserves
Hydrogen
This is the most promising alternative fuel because it is known to easily ignite. It also allows for a leaner fuel mixture to be run.
Pros:
Can be generated from water
Improves the engines efficiency
Cleaner and more complete burn since ignition temperature is lower
Releases less pollutants into our atmosphere
John Hansen says there is a 2 to 1 advantage in per mile fuel costs compared to gas engines.
Cons:
Can have premature ignition causing backfiring
More needs to be stored and at a high pressure
Has to be created by electrolyzing water which is expensive and complex
Water
A water engine signifies a potential shift away from hydrogen as a primarily green fuel. There are two kinds of engine systems that could be used when working with water, the water-cooling system and the dual injection system.
Water Cooling System:
Aizaz Khan writes, “By circulating water through the engine block and cylinder head, the system efficiently dissipates the immense heat from the combustion chambers. This cooling mechanism allows the use of lighter materials, such as aluminum, thereby reducing the vehicle’s overall weight and enhancing efficiency by permitting higher engine revs.”
Dual Injection System:
He also writes, “This system ensures optimal combustion regulation across all engine speeds. Direct injection involves delivering hydrogen directly into the cylinder, achieving complete combustion at higher engine speeds. This method ensures that a leaner hydrogen charge is supplied only when needed, maximizing efficiency and reducing emissions.”
Pros:
Greater combustion and thermal efficiency
Generates nearly zero emissions
Cons:
Stanley Meyer was the first to invent the water powered car. After 20 years of research and dedication, he was able to convert tap water into enough hydrogen power that he said he drove from one side of the country to the other promising a future of non-polluting vehicles. This vehicle was created to be able to run on any water, tap, well, garden hose, and even salt water. In 1996, he demonstrated his invention.
On March 21st, 1998, Meyer was having lunch with his stepbrother and two potential Belgian investors when he took a sip of his cranberry juice, clutched his throat, and ran outside. His last words before passing away was “They poisoned me.” The coroner's report stated that he had died from a cerebral aneurysm. “Stephen Meyer insists his brother was murdered. After all, Meyer’s invention posed an incalculable threat to billions of oil industry dollars and untold fortunes, and he’d successfully resisted succumbing to numerous buyout offers. Additionally, the inventor had warded off pressure from numerous overseas visitors and weathered persistent government spying operations. And, perhaps not so strangely, those investors who dined with the Meyer brothers on that fateful day declined to offer so much as a condolence following Meyer’s demise.” Tasha Shayne wrote.
To learn more about Stanley Meyer’s death and how his waterpower car worked, please visit here and here.
There are many other alternative fuels that people have tried to run cars on that are not as common or as reliable. Some examples are:
Sawdust
Nuclear energy
Wood
Ammonia
Hydrogen powered cars
There are currently 17,000 or fewer hydrogen powered cars in the U.S. and all of them are in California. Electric vehicles are on the rise to bring down carbon emissions but not many people know about hydrogen cars and why they are important.
So, what is a hydrogen car? How does it work?
“A hydrogen fuel-cell vehicle (HFCV for short) uses the same kind of electric motor to turn the wheels that a battery-electric car does. But it's powered not by a large, heavy battery but by a fuel-cell stack in which pure hydrogen (H2) passes through a membrane to combine with oxygen (O2) from the air, producing the electricity that turns the wheels plus water vapor. What this means is that a fuel-cell vehicle is technically a series hybrid, which is why they are sometimes classified as fuel-cell hybrid electric vehicles (FCHEV).” (John Voelcker)
What kinds of cars are hydrogen cars?
Since 2015, there have been three car companies that have offered these cars, Honda Clarity Fuel Cell, Hyundai Nexo SUV, and Toyota Mirai. Although Honda has ended the production of all Clarity models, they are releasing a new hydrogen vehicle this year: the Honda CR-V e:FCEV. Toyota is the most devoted to hydrogen power as an alternative fuel having sold around 14,300 Mirai sedans.
Are Hydrogen cars safe?
These cars are widely considered to be as safe as any other car. Like a regular gasoline car, the hydrogen high pressure tanks are designed to withstand even the highest-speed crashes. While skeptics will reference the Hindenburg explosion of 1937, no injuries or deaths specific to hydrogen components have been recorded.
How can Hydrogen cars help solve the climate crisis?
Electric vehicles aren't the answer!! Yes, they may be “greener” by not contributing to emissions when running but that doesn’t mean they are green. Lithium-ion batteries which are used to power these electric vehicles are hard to recycle which adds to our preexisting e-waste issue. The materials to make these batteries also require mining, especially for cobalt, which contributes to the hazardous residues that are released into the environment. Smelting is also required to access these materials which can emit sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere. EV is not the answer!
Hydrogen vehicles operate the same way an EV does, but their emissions are exclusively water vapor. Emissions can also be cut in transportation since hydrogen can be produced locally. They have a longer lifespan in range and in years. The hydrogen car has a minimum of 300 miles whereas an EV can just barely make that at 100% battery.
Unfortunately, they are the most expensive option out of the entire market but isn’t it worth it?
To learn more about how it works, what it’s like behind the wheel, how to fuel, the costs, and servicing Hydrogen powered cars, please visit here and here and here.
This is a great example of looking for other solutions to this problem. I have never even heard of some of these non gasoline options for a substitute. I love that you also provided a way to learn more through the link at the bottom.
ReplyDeleteI have been saying this for years, and if we only knew about these other options. Thats the problem with big companies, they will suppress any other option before we even hear about em first
ReplyDeleteI am glad we are still coming up with solutions to gasoline fueled cars. I have heard of hydrogen powered cars a couple of years ago, but until now, I forgot people may still be working on them.
ReplyDeleteI remember hearing about this story the man who invented the water engine with a very promising future was killed. That's why the oil companies did it since the water engine had a promising future they killed him because they would have lost a lot of business.
ReplyDeleteI love this so much, it makes it plain to see that fossil fuels are not the only way to sustain our demand for transportation. If we could get mass transportation (subways, busses, trains, etc.), to run off hydrogen fuel, and connect our cities better through infrastructural change, we really could see a large reduction in CO2 emissions. I hope this can be implemented further, and they find ways to make it safer. It is a sketchy business undermining the fossil fuel industry, but we need brave people to work together to make it happen.
ReplyDeleteIt's fascinating to explore the potential of hydrogen-powered cars as a cleaner alternative to traditional vehicles, especially considering their ability to produce only water vapor as emissions and their longer range compared to electric vehicles.
ReplyDeleteI appreciate that instead of focusing on one alternative to gasoline, you provided multiple alongside some of their pros and cons and how the process of using them as fuels would work. I find myself most drawn to the idea of hydrogen powered cars, but it was interesting to consider the fact ammonia was once proposed to be used as fuel.
ReplyDeleteI appreciate that you included the cons of some of these fuel alternatives! I've never known much about hydrogen-powered vehicles, but they sound like an amazing alternative to gasoline without the issue of lithium-batteries and without the same ethical sourcing issues as gasoline and materials for electric car batteries.
ReplyDeleteShowcasing alternative fuels and their advantages, such as water and hydrogen engines, shows us an achievable strategy to lessen the environmental impact of transportation. Seeing how innovation could aid in addressing the issues posed by climate change is encouraging.
ReplyDeleteHydrogen is made from natural gas (a fossil fuel) and works more or less like a battery - you put energy in and then take energy out. It is, however, only about 50% efficient (you get out about half the energy you put it) - unlike chemical batteries which are 95% efficient. So as appealing as hydrogen sounds it is not a good choice for cars. It may have some valuable industrial applications.
ReplyDeleteThe problem with a lot of alternative fuels is that their benefits are either marginal over just using gas or that they aren't feasible to begin with. Hydrogen production and the electrolysis needed to split water molecules into usable fuel for these engines is really energy intensive. If the power required to carry out these processes to begin with was green then they would be feasible, but as of now they aren't.
ReplyDeleteWe just talked about this subject in my human geography class. It's important that we figure out how to change the need for gasoline because we won't always have it and it's destroying the world.
ReplyDeleteWow... I love this post. You did a great job researching it and presenting in a way that is easier to understand. I have never heard of these alternatives before, it is really important that we find an alternative to gas because it is so harmful to everything we wish to maintain.
ReplyDeleteI love this post, Brynn! Hydrogen cars sound super promising—cleaner and longer range is a win. They're pricey now, but with more awareness, that could change. Thanks for sharing!
ReplyDeleteThis is a very informative and well-written post! Reading about all of the alternative vehicle energy sources makes me wonder why these aren't being implemented sooner. I'm glad to see that hydrogen powered cars are already being used, and I hope to see more of this!
ReplyDeleteCheck out my comment above about hydrogen.
ReplyDelete