According to a study done, there are two factors that are most closely linked to the formation of at least one counter climate change organization are the strength of a country's commitment to protecting the natural environment and the level of formal organization in its social. In this study they identified 164 countries that have climate laws and backing. As well stated that 60% of the 548 organizations identified in the study are based in the United States. The biggest contributors are from economic interests of energy and agriculture which account for more than half of the global greenhouse gas emissions. Also according to the study, countries with oil venues as a higher percentage of GDP are less likely to have a counter climate change organization. A lot of people believe as political climate becomes more divded, climate movements seem to find fertile ground.
Currently more than 170 countries have national policies and laws on climate change adaptation to address impacts including the rising risks of extreme events such as flood, and droughts. Which 91 countries have at least one law that address climate change adaptation, which means adaptation is now addressed in the executive policies of at least 170 countries which means about 87% of the world have decided to take executive and governmental resources to help combat climate change. The biggest laws or policies that were adopted by a majority of these countries was legislative action on greenhouse gas emissions. Currently the biggest contributor to carbon emissions is China, there are legally-binding country targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions are formally called nationally determined contributions (NDCs) and are recorded on the UN global registry. China aim to achieve carbon neutrality before 2060, and to track and detect leaks in methane. While the United States is the second biggest emitter in the world and has failed for multiple years trying to lower their carbon emissions, but they are trying to cut it by 50% by 2030, but currently doesn't look like it's on the best track. The the third biggest annual emitter is India, which are struggling to make any headway and is willing to-reduce its emissions by 45% by 2030.Activism in the world used to be a dream but over the last couple of years people have finally woken up and realized that this isn't a hoax and there is real damage being done if people in government don't end up doing anything about it. Unfortunately, promises and wishes don't solve all of our environmental issues and reduce our carbon emissions, overall it will take real accountability to beat this thing, but I think we are headed in the right direction.
Hearing that 87% of the world has taken actions to combat climate change is great, such a larger percentage that I hope the US will play a bigger part in one day.
ReplyDeleteLove this! Thank you for talking about this. It’s honestly refreshing to see the amount of countries with these types of laws and policies. Let’s hope it stays this way and continues to grow.
ReplyDeleteThis was a very interesting and informative post, it is always nice to hear about what action is being taken towards addressing and hopefully slowing the climate crisis.
ReplyDeleteThis is an informative call to the urgency regarding the world’s current stance of reaching future neutral carbon emissions. Real accountability would help so much to reduce carbon emissions and you a very right, I think the global and national awareness of climate change is increasing rapidly but there is only so much time.
ReplyDeleteIt's encouraging to see that so many countries are taking legislative action on climate change, even though there's still a long way to go. 87% is very optimistic, however, it's concerning that the US and India are struggling to meet their goals.
ReplyDeleteThe United States should be a leader when it comes to climate change. We should not wait for other countries to take the first steps. I did find that map of the world to be very interesting. Seeing smaller countries taking the first steps to combat climate change.
ReplyDeleteGreat post, Noah! It’s wild how much activism has grown worldwide, but it’s frustrating that some of the biggest polluters still struggle to make real progress. With China aiming for carbon neutrality by 2060 and the U.S. trying to cut emissions by 50% by 2030, do you think these goals are actually realistic, or just political promises?
ReplyDeleteIt's so interesting that China is the biggest contributor of greenhouse gasses and that's where we get a lot of products from. It seems like we need to be more conscious of our consumerism and how our shopping habits effect climate change.
ReplyDeleteI love that countries can work together to enact climate change policies that will make a significant difference in the future. I can only hope that more countries will follow suit, especially since there has been so many wake up calls of the insane impact of climate change disasters. I hope these are not just empty promises, and we can look forward to a world where we all are not just carbon neutral but carbon negative.
ReplyDeleteAfter our class discussion on, migration and how climate change would impact moving, it's scary to think of what a mass job this will become in the future. Eventually, with rising sea levels and climate change, we will have displaced many people who need new homes and can no longer stay where they are. It's scary to think of how devastating climate change and global warming are in our everyday lives.
ReplyDeleteGlobal efforts to combat climate change are increasing, with most countries enacting policies to reduce emissions, yet major emitters like the U.S., China, and India still face significant challenges. Real progress will require stronger accountability, decisive action, and sustained commitment from governments and industries alike.
ReplyDeleteHearing about these global efforts is comforting, but I'm still wondering if it'll even be enough.
ReplyDeleteThis piece really reflects what we are talking about in "Nomad Century" by Gaia Vince. Specifically, it continues with the theme of globalism and highlights our intrinsic reliance and affect on each other.
ReplyDeleteIt is such a sad truth when China who has worse air quality than the US wants to do more. Why is it that the US does not seem to want to do anything about the emissions? It is great that there are people and countries working for change.
ReplyDeleteThese climate laws seem to be the only thing to legally enforce countries to take action. It is shocking that it took until it got this bad for this type of action to be showing progress, although that progress is continued to be combatted with the divide in political movements. I only wonder if these areas will actually begin to take action when the effects are already irreversible.
ReplyDeleteThis is such an important post; I am so glad you dove into this. To see that 87% of the world is working towards improving climate change knowing that we just backed out is sad. I was surprised to see the US said we'd cut back 50% by 2030, unfortunately I don't see that happening.
ReplyDeleteThis global movement described by the Stanford Study is critical - especially now with the United States going the wrong way. A key question: How can other countries pressure the United States for better action on climate?
ReplyDeleteSeeing and reading about people from different countries come together to for the greater go to try and fix the issue makes America pulling out from the Paris acts proves how wrong we are
ReplyDelete